Nutritools

Log in Register

Tool Library Tool Information Best Practice Guidelines – Evaluation Checklist (opens new tab)

Validation Information: Weighed Food Diary

Livingstone 1992

Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents

Energy intakes assessed by 7-d weighed dietary records (EI-WDRs) and diet histories (EI-DHs) were compared with concurrent estimates of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water method in 78 subjects aged 3-18y. El-WDRs were not obtained from the 3- and 5-y-old subjects. El-WDRs in the 7- and 9-y-old children were 108 ± 25% (n = 12) and 97 ± 15% (n = 12), respectively, of corresponding TEE values showing good agreement. However in the 12-, 15-, and 18-y-old subjects EI-WDR averaged 89 ± 12% (n = 12), 78 ± 18% (n = 12), and 73 ± 25% (n = 10), respectively, of corresponding TEE values. The difference was ≥ 20% in 13 adolescents. Mean EI-DHs were 114 ± 19% (3y), 111 ± 19% (5y), 111 ± 23% (7y), 106 ± 9% (9y), 114 ± 17% (12y), 101 ± 21% (15y), and 98 ± 21% (18y) of TEE estimates. Differences were significant in the 3-, 9-, and 12-y-old subjects. Results suggest that 7-d El-WDRs tend to underestimate food intake of adolescents. Although EI-DHs were biased towards overestimation in most age groups and individual measurements lacked precision, EI-DHs were more representative of habitual intake than were El-WDRs.

Web Link

Validation Information

Author
Livingstone
Year of Publication
1992

Tool Information

Dietary Exposure Measured
Energy
Tool Type
Weighed Food Diary
Timeframe Tool Measures info
1 Day
Portion Size Measures info
Subjects weighed their foods using a set of dietary scales which were provided. Also provided was a logbook for recording food and fluids eaten. Subjects were not instructed how to estimate portion sizes of food eaten outside the home because this additional imposition may have interfered with usual eating behavior. However, when possible. corresponding portions of the food were bought and weighed but when this was not feasible estimared weights were substituted.
Reporting Method info
Prospective
Format info
Paper
Supplements Measured
Not Reported
Administration Method info
Self-administered (12, 15 & 18 years old). by-proxy: parents (7 & 9 year old). Kitchen supervisory staff at playgroups and schools recorded cooked school lunches and cafeteria-type meals and snacks.

Study Information

Study Location
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Associated Nutrient Database
McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th edition and supplements
Comparator Validated Against
Doubly Labelled Water

Participants

Sample Size
12 (7 years old), 12 (9 years old), 12 (12 years old), 12 (15 years old), 10 (18 years old), 58 (7-18 years old)
Lifestage
Children (7 years), Children (9 years), Adolescents (12 years), Adolescents (15 years), Adolescents (18 years), Children, Adolescents (7-18 years)
Age of Population

Range: 7-18 years

Sex
Both
Other Notable Characteristics
Population represented a range of Socio-economic areas of Belfast

Total number of nutrients validated: 1 info

Not all of the nutrients validated in the validation studies are included in the table below, as statistical data was only selected to be displayed for a number of nutrients, this included:

  • Energy
  • Fat
  • Saturated Fat
  • Mono-unsaturated Fat
  • Poly-unsaturated Fat
  • Carbohydrates
  • Protein
  • Sugar
  • Non‐starch polysaccharides(NSP)
  • Sodium
  • Calcium
  • Iron
  • Zinc
  • Retinol
  • Folate
  • Folic Acid
  • Vitamin B12
  • Vitamin C
  • Fruit & Vegetables
  • Urinary Nitrogen

To find information on the other validated nutrients please read the validation study.

  • Energy
  • Macronutrients: 0
  • Micronutrients: 0
Comparator Lifestage Sex Nutrient Measured info Mean Difference Standard Deviation info Correlation Coefficient info Cohen's Kappa Coefficient Percentage Agreement Percentage Agreement Categories info Lower Limits of Agreement Upper Limits of Agreement
Doubly Labelled Water Children (7 years) Both Energy (kcal) 136
Energy (kJ) 570
Doubly Labelled Water Children (9 years) Both Energy (kcal) -79
Energy (kJ) -330
Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (12 years) Both Energy (kcal) -282
Energy (kJ) -1180
Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (15 years) Both Energy (kcal) -629
Energy (kJ) -2630
Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (18 years) Both Energy (kcal) -1009
Energy (kJ) -4220
Doubly Labelled Water Children, Adolescents (7-18 years) Both Energy (kcal) -351 698 -1747 1045
Energy (kJ) -1470 2920 -7310 4370

Some results have been calculated using statistical techniques based on the published data.

For further information on statistical terms click on Statistical tests used in validation studies

All correlations coefficients in the table are unadjusted unless stated otherwise. For adjusted correlation coefficients and other statistical methods used in the study e.g. paired t-tests, please read the validation articles.

  • # Adjusted
  • † Energy adjusted.
  • ‡ For loge-transformed, energy-adjusted nutrient intakes.
  • ^ Adjacent included.
  • ᵟ Participants provided identical responses.
  • (w) = Weighted.

Livingstone MB, Prentice AM, Coward WA, Strain JJ, Black AE, Davies PS, et al. Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1992 Jul 1;56(1):29-35.