Nutritools

Log in Register

Tool Library Tool Information Best Practice Guidelines – Evaluation Checklist (opens new tab)

Validation Information: WDDRs

Matsuzaki 2017

Validity of Nutrient Intakes Derived from an Internet Website Dish-Based Dietary Record for Self-Management of Weight among Japanese Women

This artical compared the relative validity of nutrient intakes derived from Internet website dish-based dietary records (WDDRs) and weighed dietary records (DRs). The study participants were 218 registered users of a dietary management website. After excluding 55 participants, a total of 163 participants were included in the final analyses. The participants were Japanese women, and their mean age and mean body mass index (BMI) were 39.3 (+/-10.3) years and 22.3 (+/-3.7) years, respectively. We compared differences in the DR and WDDR with respect to intakes of energy and 13 nutrients. The median values for the intake of protein and seven nutrients showed no significant difference between the DR and WDDR, and the estimated values were generally similar. The interquartile range of nutrients with a significant difference did not show a large deviation, with the exception of vitamin A. Correlation coefficients showed a strong correlation of 0.7, with the exception of sodium and vitamin E. The kappa coefficients for energy and for some nutrients were good to fair. Using Bland-Altman plots, we found proportional errors in the intake values for vitamins and minerals. We could not confirm obvious systematic errors for energy, protein, fat, or carbohydrate intake. WDDR use is considered to be a valid method for estimating energy and nutrient intakes among Japanese women.

Web Link

Validation Information

Author
Matsuzaki
Year of Publication
2017

Tool Information

Dietary Exposure Measured
Full Nutrient
Tool Type
Weighed Food Diary
Timeframe Tool Measures info
1 Day
Portion Size Measures info
Participants selected portion size through food photographs.
Reporting Method info
Prospective
Format info
Online
Supplements Measured
Not Reported
Administration Method info
Self-administered

Study Information

Study Location
Sakado, Japan
Associated Nutrient Database
WDDR database
Comparator Validated Against
Other

Participants

Sample Size
163 (Female, Adults)
Lifestage
Adults
Age of Population

Mean(SD): 39.3(10.3) years (Female)

Sex
Female Only
Other Notable Characteristics
The participants were Japanese women

Total number of nutrients validated: 13 info

Not all of the nutrients validated in the validation studies are included in the table below, as statistical data was only selected to be displayed for a number of nutrients, this included:

  • Energy
  • Fat
  • Saturated Fat
  • Mono-unsaturated Fat
  • Poly-unsaturated Fat
  • Carbohydrates
  • Protein
  • Sugar
  • Non‐starch polysaccharides(NSP)
  • Sodium
  • Calcium
  • Iron
  • Zinc
  • Retinol
  • Folate
  • Folic Acid
  • Vitamin B12
  • Vitamin C
  • Fruit & Vegetables
  • Urinary Nitrogen

To find information on the other validated nutrients please read the validation study.

  • Energy
  • Macronutrients: 6
  • Micronutrients: 8
Comparator Lifestage Sex Nutrient Measured info Mean Difference Standard Deviation info Correlation Coefficient info Cohen's Kappa Coefficient Percentage Agreement Percentage Agreement Categories info Lower Limits of Agreement Upper Limits of Agreement
Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only Energy (kcal) 82 (Median) 0.87 (S) 0.70 (w) 66.3 4
Protein (g) -0.4 (Median) 0.78 (S) 0.53 (w) 51.5 4
Fat (g) -0.2 (Median) 0.75 (S) 0.52 (w) 51.5 4
Carbohydrates (g) 8 (Median) 0.82 (S) 0.55 (w) 50.9 4
Sodium (mg) 0.4 (Median) 0.59 (S) 0.34 (w) 41.1 4
Calcium (mg) 4 (Median) 0.77 (S) 0.61 (w) 57.1 4
Iron (mg) 0 (Median) 0.81 (S) 0.64 (w) 58.9 4
Vitamin C (mg) -7 (Median) 0.81 (S) 0.62 (w) 58.3 4

Some results have been calculated using statistical techniques based on the published data.

For further information on statistical terms click on Statistical tests used in validation studies

All correlations coefficients in the table are unadjusted unless stated otherwise. For adjusted correlation coefficients and other statistical methods used in the study e.g. paired t-tests, please read the validation articles.

  • # Adjusted
  • † Energy adjusted.
  • ‡ For loge-transformed, energy-adjusted nutrient intakes.
  • ^ Adjacent included.
  • ᵟ Participants provided identical responses.
  • (w) = Weighted.

Matsuzaki E, Michie M, Kawabata T. Validity of Nutrient Intakes Derived from an Internet Website Dish-Based Dietary Record for Self-Management of Weight among Japanese Women. Nutrients. 2017;9(10):24.