Nutritools

Log in Register

Tool Library Tool Information Best Practice Guidelines – Evaluation Checklist (opens new tab)

Validation Information: Photo-based dietary record

Prinz 2018

Feasibility and relative validity of a digital photo-based dietary assessment: results from the Nutris-Phone study

Objective: For dietary assessment, mobile devices with a camera can be used as an alternative to hand-written paper records. The Nutritional Tracking Information Smartphone (Nutris-Phone) study aimed to examine relative validity and feasibility of a photo-based dietary record in everyday life.

Design: Parallel to the photo-based technique, a weighed record was performed. Participant satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. A trained nutrition scientist evaluated portion sizes and nutrient content was calculated (DGExpert). Spearman correlation and Bland–Altman analyses were applied.

Setting: Healthy, non-pregnant volunteers (≥18 years) without intent to lose weight recruited at Ulm University, Germany.

Subjects: Sixty-six participants (36 % males, median age 22·0 (interquartile range 20·0–25·0) years) took pictures of foods and beverages consumed with a commercially available mobile phone.

Results: Significant correlation between the photo-based and weighed record was observed: energy (r=0·991), carbohydrate (r=0·980), fat (r=0·972), protein (r=0·988), fibre (r=0·941). Bland–Altman analyses indicated comparable means and acceptable 95 % limits of agreement (energy: −345·2 to 302·9 kJ (−82·5 to 72·4 kcal); carbohydrate: −15·2 to 13·1 g; fat: −6·4 to 6·4 g; protein: −5·9 to 5·6 g; fibre: −2·7 to 2·5 g). However, with increasing intake level, underestimation by the digital method was present (except for fat, all P<0·01). Over 80 % of participants were satisfied with the photo-based record. In nearly 90 %, technical implementation was without major problems.

Conclusions: Compared with a weighed record, the photo-based dietary record seems to be valid, feasible and user-friendly to estimate energy, macronutrient and fibre intakes, although a systematic bias with increasing levels of intake should be kept in mind.

Web Link

Validation Information

Author
Prinz
Year of Publication
2018

Tool Information

Dietary Exposure Measured
Energy, Macronutrient
Tool Type
Food Diary Estimated
Timeframe Tool Measures info
1 Day
Portion Size Measures info
The 2 € coin is used as a reference and is placed in the upper corner of each picture.
Reporting Method info
Prospective
Format info
Online
Supplements Measured
Not Reported
Administration Method info
Self-administered

Study Information

Study Location
Germany.
Associated Nutrient Database
Not Reported
Comparator Validated Against
Weighed Food Diary

Participants

Sample Size
66
Lifestage
Adults and Elderly
Age of Population

median age 22 (interquartile range 20–25) years

Sex
Both
Other Notable Characteristics
Healthy, non-pregnant volunteers (≥18 years) without intent to lose weight recruited at Ulm University, Germany.

Total number of nutrients validated: 4 info

Not all of the nutrients validated in the validation studies are included in the table below, as statistical data was only selected to be displayed for a number of nutrients, this included:

  • Energy
  • Fat
  • Saturated Fat
  • Mono-unsaturated Fat
  • Poly-unsaturated Fat
  • Carbohydrates
  • Protein
  • Sugar
  • Non‐starch polysaccharides(NSP)
  • Sodium
  • Calcium
  • Iron
  • Zinc
  • Retinol
  • Folate
  • Folic Acid
  • Vitamin B12
  • Vitamin C
  • Fruit & Vegetables
  • Urinary Nitrogen

To find information on the other validated nutrients please read the validation study.

  • Energy
  • Macronutrients: 4
  • Micronutrients: 0
Comparator Lifestage Sex Nutrient Measured info Mean Difference Standard Deviation info Correlation Coefficient info Cohen's Kappa Coefficient Percentage Agreement Percentage Agreement Categories info Lower Limits of Agreement Upper Limits of Agreement
Weighed Food Diary Adults and Elderly Both Energy (kcal) 3.48% (Median) 0.991(S)
Protein (g) 2.37% (Median) 0.988 (S)
Fat (g) 8.12% (Median) 0.972 (S)
Carbohydrates (g) -0.10% (Median) 0.980 (S)
Fibre (g) -4.44% (Median) 0.941 (S)

Some results have been calculated using statistical techniques based on the published data.

For further information on statistical terms click on Statistical tests used in validation studies

All correlations coefficients in the table are unadjusted unless stated otherwise. For adjusted correlation coefficients and other statistical methods used in the study e.g. paired t-tests, please read the validation articles.

  • # Adjusted
  • † Energy adjusted.
  • ‡ For loge-transformed, energy-adjusted nutrient intakes.
  • ^ Adjacent included.
  • ᵟ Participants provided identical responses.
  • (w) = Weighted.

Prinz N, Bohn B, Kern A, Pungel D, Pollatos O, Holl RW. Feasibility and relative validity of a digital photo-based dietary assessment: results from the Nutris-Phone study. Public Health Nutrition. 2019;22(7):1160-7.