Nutritools

Log in Register

Tool Library Tool Information Best Practice Guidelines – Evaluation Checklist (opens new tab)

Validation Information: Weighed Food Diary (DONALD)

Bokhof 2010

Validation of protein intake assessed from weighed dietary records against protein estimated from 24 h urine samples in children, adolescents and young adults participating in the Dortmund Nutritional and Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study

Objective: To date, only a few nutritional assessment methods have been validated against the biomarker of urinary-N excretion for use in children and adolescents. The aim of the present study was to validate protein intake from one day of a weighed dietary record against protein intake estimated from a simultaneously collected 24 h urine sample.

Design: Cross-sectional analyses including 439 participants of the Dortmund Nutritional and Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study from four age groups (3-4, 7-8, 11-13 and 18-23 years). Mean differences, Pearson correlation coefficients (r), cross-classifications and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess agreement between methods.

Results: Weighed dietary records significantly underestimated mean protein intake by -6.4 (95% CI -8.2, -4.7) g/d or -11 %, with the difference increasing across the age groups from -0.6 (95% CI -2.7, 1.5) g/d at age 3-4 years to -13.5 (95% CI -18.7, -8.3) g/d at age 18-23 years. Correlation coefficients were r=0.7 for the total study sample and ranged from r=0.5 to 0.6 in the different age groups. Both methods classified 85% into the same/adjacent quartile for the whole study group (83-86% for the different age groups) and 2.5% into the opposite quartile (1.9-3.1% for the different age groups). Bland-Altman plots for the total sample indicated that differences in protein intake increased across the range of protein intake, while this bias was not obvious within the age groups.

Conclusions: Protein intake in children and adolescents can be estimated with acceptable validity by weighed dietary records. In this age-heterogeneous sample, validity was lower among adolescents and young adults.

Web Link

Validation Information

Author
Bokhof
Year of Publication
2010

Tool Information

Dietary Exposure Measured
Macronutrient
Tool Type
Weighed Food Diary
Timeframe Tool Measures info
1 day
Portion Size Measures info
Foods and beverages were weighed using electronic food scales measured to the nearest 1 g. If exact weighing was not possible, household measuring was used.
Reporting Method info
Prospective
Format info
Paper
Supplements Measured
Not reported
Administration Method info
By-proxy: Parent

Study Information

Study Location
Dortmund, Germany
Associated Nutrient Database
LEBTAB
Comparator Validated Against
Biomarkers

Participants

Sample Size
97 (3-4 years), 137 (7-8 years), 102 (11-13 years), 103 (18-23 years), 439 (3-23 years)
Lifestage
Children (3-4 years), Children (7-8 years), Adolescents, Adolescents, Adults, Children, Adolescents, Adults
Age of Population

Range: 3-23 years

Sex
Both
Other Notable Characteristics
N in urine was measured by the Kjeldahl method and the assumption was made that the N excreted accounted for 80% of the ingested protein.

Total number of nutrients validated: 1 info

Not all of the nutrients validated in the validation studies are included in the table below, as statistical data was only selected to be displayed for a number of nutrients, this included:

  • Energy
  • Fat
  • Saturated Fat
  • Mono-unsaturated Fat
  • Poly-unsaturated Fat
  • Carbohydrates
  • Protein
  • Sugar
  • Non‐starch polysaccharides(NSP)
  • Sodium
  • Calcium
  • Iron
  • Zinc
  • Retinol
  • Folate
  • Folic Acid
  • Vitamin B12
  • Vitamin C
  • Fruit & Vegetables
  • Urinary Nitrogen

To find information on the other validated nutrients please read the validation study.

  • Macronutrients: 1
  • Micronutrients: 0
Comparator Lifestage Sex Nutrient Measured info Mean Difference Standard Deviation info Correlation Coefficient info Cohen's Kappa Coefficient Percentage Agreement Percentage Agreement Categories info Lower Limits of Agreement Upper Limits of Agreement
Biomarkers Children (3-4 years) Both Protein (g) -0.6 0.52 (P) 85.6 4
Biomarkers Children (7-8 years) Both Protein (g) -5.0 0.56 (P) 83.2 4
Biomarkers Adolescents Both Protein (g) -6.8 0.59 (P) 83.3 4
Biomarkers Adolescents, Adults Both Protein (g) -13.5 0.48 (P) 86.4 4
Biomarkers Children, Adolescents, Adults Both Protein (g) -6.4 0.70 (P) 84.5 4

Some results have been calculated using statistical techniques based on the published data.

For further information on statistical terms click on Statistical tests used in validation studies

All correlations coefficients in the table are unadjusted unless stated otherwise. For adjusted correlation coefficients and other statistical methods used in the study e.g. paired t-tests, please read the validation articles.

  • # Adjusted
  • † Energy adjusted.
  • ‡ For loge-transformed, energy-adjusted nutrient intakes.
  • ^ Adjacent included.
  • ᵟ Participants provided identical responses.
  • (w) = Weighted.

Bokhof B, Günther AL, Berg-Beckhoff G, Kroke A, Buyken AE. Validation of protein intake assessed from weighed dietary records against protein estimated from 24 h urine samples in children, adolescents and young adults participating in the Dortmund Nutritional and Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study. Public health nutrition. 2010 Jun;13(6):826-34.