Tool Library Tool Information
Validation Information: FFQ (II) (Nutrients)
The Dutch EPIC Food Frequency Questionnaire. II. Relative Validity and Reproducibility for Nutrients
Background. A self-administered semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed for the Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
Methods. The reproducibility and relative validity of nutrient intake as assessed by this questionnaire were investigated in a population of 121 men and women. To assess the relative validity, 12 monthly 24-hour recalls served as reference method, together with four determinations of 24-hour urinary nitrogen excretion, predicted basal metabolic rate, and serum b-carotene and a-tocopherol levels.
Results. Protein and, among women, energy intake were underestimated by the questionnaire compared to urinary nitrogen excretion and the basal metabolic rate, respectively. The underestimation for protein decreased with increasing protein intake. Pearson correlation coefficients between nutrient intakes assessed by repeated questionnaires ranged from 0.70 to 0.94 among men and from 0.59 to 0.94 among women. Correlation coefficients between nutrient intakes assessed by the questionnaire and 24-hour recalls ranged from 0.26 to 0.83 for men and from 0.35 to 0.90 for women, with medians of 0.59 and 0.58, respectively. Correlation coefficients between 0.2 and 0.5 were observed for b-carotene and vitamin C for men and for b-carotene and vitamin E for women. Associations with serum b-carotene (r = –0.16 for men; 0.13 for women) and a-tocopherol (0.23 and 0.15, respectively) were much poorer than those obtained with 24-hour recalls. Correlations between protein intake and 24-hour urinary nitrogen excretion were 0.47 and 0.53, respectively.
Conclusions. The FFQ seems adequate for ranking subjects according to intake of energy, macronutrients, dietary fibre and retinol, but it does not yield such good results for b-carotene, vitamin C for men, vitamin E for women.
Total number of nutrients validated: 8
Not all of the nutrients validated in the validation studies are included in the table below, as statistical data was only selected to be displayed for a number of nutrients, this included:
- Saturated Fat
- Mono-unsaturated Fat
- Poly-unsaturated Fat
- Non‐starch polysaccharides(NSP)
- Folic Acid
- Vitamin B12
- Vitamin C
- Fruit & Vegetables
- Urinary Nitrogen
To find information on the other validated nutrients please read the validation study.
- Macronutrients: 4
- Micronutrients: 4
|Comparator||Lifestage||Sex||Nutrient Measured||Mean Difference||Standard Deviation||Correlation Coefficient||Cohen's Kappa Coefficient||Percentage Agreement||Percentage Agreement Categories||Lower Limits of Agreement||Upper Limits of Agreement|
|24hr Recall||Adults||Male Only||Energy (kcal)||72||0.71 (P)|
|Protein (g)||2||0.61 (P)|
|Fat (g)||12||0.69 (P)|
|Carbohydrate (g)||3||0.72 (P)|
|Fibre (g)||1.5||0.51 (P)|
|Retinol (mg)||0.08||0.57 (P)|
|Vitamin C (mg)||21||0.39(P)|
|24hr Recall||Adults||Female Only||Energy (kcal)||96||0.58 (P)|
|Protein (g)||2||0.51 (P)|
|Fat (g)||10||0.58 (P)|
|Carbohydrate (g)||4||0.66 (P)|
|Fibre (g)||1.3||0.67 (P)|
|Retinol (mg)||0.1||0.57 (P)|
|Vitamin C (mg)||22||0.58 (P)|
Some results have been calculated using statistical techniques based on the published data.
For further information on statistical terms click on Statistical tests used in validation studies
All correlations coefficients in the table are unadjusted unless stated otherwise. For adjusted correlation coefficients and other statistical methods used in the study e.g. paired t-tests, please read the validation articles.
- # Adjusted
- † Energy adjusted.
- ‡ For loge-transformed, energy-adjusted nutrient intakes.
- ^ Adjacent included.
- ᵟ Participants provided identical responses.
- (w) = Weighted.
Ocke M C, Bueno-De-Mesquita H Bas, Pols M.A, Smit H.A, Van Stavern W.A. & Kromhout D. The Dutch EPIC Food Frequency Questionnaire. II. Relative Validity and Reproducibility for Nutrients. (1997). International Journal of Epidemiology. (1997) 26 (1) supplement 1