Nutritools

Log in Register

Tool Library Tool Information Best Practice Guidelines – Evaluation Checklist (opens new tab)

Validation Information: FFQ (Bone mineral density)

Rivas 2009

Validation of questionnaires for the study of food habits and bone mass

Background:

Epidemiologic studies must have a reliable method for evaluating food intake; therefore, valid, precise, and practical instruments are essential.

Objective:

To assess the relative validity and estimate the calibration factors of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for adolescents.

Design:

Validation and calibration study.

Subjects/settings:

This study enrolled 169 adolescents from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A set of three food records was used as the reference method.

Statistical analyses performed:

The relative validity was analyzed according to weighted κ values for the quartile categorization of energy and nutrient intakes, Pearson correlation coefficients, and the Bland-Altman method. To estimate the calibration factors for the FFQ, linear regression models, including the food record means as dependent variables and the FFQ estimations as independent variables were developed for boys and girls.

Results:

The weighted kappa; values ranged from 0.28 to 0.44 for the raw data and from 0.16 to 0.39 for the deattenuated and energy-adjusted data. The Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.33 to 0.46, and the mean agreement varied from 62% to 143%. The calibration factors estimated for boys ranged from 0.15 to 0.48, and the factors estimated for girls ranged from 0.14 to 0.47. The mean energy and nutrient intakes estimated by the calibrated FFQ were similar to the means estimated by the food records; however, the standard deviations were smaller for the calibrated FFQ estimations.

Conclusions:

The tested FFQ is a suitable tool for ranking energy and nutrients intake in the studied group. Calibration factors are needed to estimate energy and nutrient intake means and should be used to correct raw data as well as association measurements based on FFQ data.

Web Link

Validation Information

Author
Rivas
Year of Publication
2009

Tool Information

Dietary Exposure Measured
Full Nutrient
Tool Type
Food Frequency Questionnaire
Timeframe Tool Measures info
1 year
Portion Size Measures info
Not reported
Reporting Method info
Retrospective
Format info
Paper
Supplements Measured
Not reported
Administration Method info
Self-administered

Study Information

Study Location
Granada, Spain
Associated Nutrient Database
Not reported
Comparator Validated Against
24hr Recall

Participants

Sample Size
91 (Female)
Lifestage
Adults
Age of Population

Age Range: 18-65 years; Mean(SD): 41.95(11.39) years

Sex
Female Only
Other Notable Characteristics
Healthy adult women

Total number of nutrients validated: 23 info

Not all of the nutrients validated in the validation studies are included in the table below, as statistical data was only selected to be displayed for a number of nutrients, this included:

  • Energy
  • Fat
  • Saturated Fat
  • Mono-unsaturated Fat
  • Poly-unsaturated Fat
  • Carbohydrates
  • Protein
  • Sugar
  • Non‐starch polysaccharides(NSP)
  • Sodium
  • Calcium
  • Iron
  • Zinc
  • Retinol
  • Folate
  • Folic Acid
  • Vitamin B12
  • Vitamin C
  • Fruit & Vegetables
  • Urinary Nitrogen

To find information on the other validated nutrients please read the validation study.

  • Energy
  • Macronutrients: 7
  • Micronutrients: 6
Comparator Lifestage Sex Nutrient Measured info Mean Difference Standard Deviation info Correlation Coefficient info Cohen's Kappa Coefficient Percentage Agreement Percentage Agreement Categories info Lower Limits of Agreement Upper Limits of Agreement
24hr Recall Adults Female Only Energy (kcal) 543 0.47 (S) -695 1780
Protein (g) 28 0.43 (S) -33 90
Fat (g) 3 0.26 (S) -73 79
Saturated fat (g) 5 0.30 (S) -26 37
MUFA (g) -13 0.27 (S) -49 24
PUFA (g) 2 0.23 (S) -9 15
Carbohydrates (g) -62 0.45 (S) -331 207
Calcium (mg) -557 0.29 (S) -1585 471
Iron (mg) 5.5 0.30 (S) -34.3 45.3
Zinc (mg) 1.7 0.29 (S) -9.2 12.6
Folic acid (µg) 37 0.29 (S) -159.2 233.0
Vitamin B12 (µg) -3.6 0.05 (S) -30.7 22.5
Vitamin C (mg) 74.4 0.29 (S) -52.3 201

Some results have been calculated using statistical techniques based on the published data.

For further information on statistical terms click on Statistical tests used in validation studies

All correlations coefficients in the table are unadjusted unless stated otherwise. For adjusted correlation coefficients and other statistical methods used in the study e.g. paired t-tests, please read the validation articles.

  • # Adjusted
  • † Energy adjusted.
  • ‡ For loge-transformed, energy-adjusted nutrient intakes.
  • ^ Adjacent included.
  • ᵟ Participants provided identical responses.
  • (w) = Weighted.

Rivas A, Romero A, Mariscal M, Monteagudo C, Hernández J, Olea-Serrano F. Validación de cuestionarios para el estudio de hábitos alimentarios y masa ósea. Nutrición Hospitalaria. 2009;24:521-8.