Nutritools

Log in Register

Tool Library Tool Information Best Practice Guidelines – Evaluation Checklist (opens new tab)

Validation Information: Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program Adults (SNAPA)

Hillier 2012

The development and evaluation of a novel Internet-based computer program to assess previous-day dietary and physical activity behaviours in adults: the Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program for Adults (SNAPA)

The Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program for Adults (SNAPATM) was developed to address the need for accurate, reliable, feasible, inexpensive and low-burden methods for assessing specific dietary and physical activity behaviours in adults. Short-term test-retest reliability of SNAPATM was assessed in forty-four adults (age 41·4 (SD 17·3) years) who completed SNAPATM twice in 1 day. Concurrent validity against direct dietary observation and combined heart rate and accelerometry was assessed in seventy-seven adults (age 34·4 (SD11·1) years). Test-retest reliability revealed no substantial systematic shifts in mean values of the outcome variables: percentage of food energy from fat (% fat), number of portions of fruit and vegetables (FV) and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). For lunchtime dietary intake, the mean match rate between food items reported using SNAPATM and those observed was 81·7 %, with a phantom rate of 5·6%. Pearson’s correlations between SNAPATM and the reference methods ranged from 0·27 to 0·56 for %fat, FV portions and minutes of MVPA. For %fat and FV intake, there was no fixed or proportional bias, and mean differences between the methods (SNAPATM - reference) were 5·1% and 0 portions, respectively. For minutes of MVPA, a fixed bias of -28 min was revealed when compared with all minutes of MVPA measured by combined heart rate and accelerometry, whereas a proportional bias (slope 1·47) was revealed when compared with minutes carried out in bouts ≥10 min. SNAPATM is a promising tool for measuring specific energy balance behaviours, though further work is required to improve accuracy for physical activity behaviours.

Web Link

Validation Information

Author
Hillier
Year of Publication
2012

Tool Information

Dietary Exposure Measured
Food Groups
Tool Type
24 Hour Recall
Timeframe Tool Measures info
1 Day
Portion Size Measures info
Each food and drink item is assigned a portion size based on the average intake of adults in the UK.
Reporting Method info
Retrospective
Format info
Online
Supplements Measured
Not Reported
Administration Method info
Self-administered

Study Information

Study Location
Tees Valley region, England
Associated Nutrient Database
McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 6th edition
Comparator Validated Against
Other

Participants

Sample Size
46
Lifestage
Adults
Age of Population

Mean(SD): 34.4(11.1) years

Sex
Both
Other Notable Characteristics
N/A

Total number of nutrients validated: 0 info

Not all of the nutrients validated in the validation studies are included in the table below, as statistical data was only selected to be displayed for a number of nutrients, this included:

  • Energy
  • Fat
  • Saturated Fat
  • Mono-unsaturated Fat
  • Poly-unsaturated Fat
  • Carbohydrates
  • Protein
  • Sugar
  • Non‐starch polysaccharides(NSP)
  • Sodium
  • Calcium
  • Iron
  • Zinc
  • Retinol
  • Folate
  • Folic Acid
  • Vitamin B12
  • Vitamin C
  • Fruit & Vegetables
  • Urinary Nitrogen

To find information on the other validated nutrients please read the validation study.

  • Macronutrients: 0
  • Micronutrients: 0
Comparator Lifestage Sex Nutrient Measured info Mean Difference Standard Deviation info Correlation Coefficient info Cohen's Kappa Coefficient Percentage Agreement Percentage Agreement Categories info Lower Limits of Agreement Upper Limits of Agreement
Direct Observation Adults Both Fruit and Vegetables (portions) 0.0

Some results have been calculated using statistical techniques based on the published data.

For further information on statistical terms click on Statistical tests used in validation studies

All correlations coefficients in the table are unadjusted unless stated otherwise. For adjusted correlation coefficients and other statistical methods used in the study e.g. paired t-tests, please read the validation articles.

  • # Adjusted
  • † Energy adjusted.
  • ‡ For loge-transformed, energy-adjusted nutrient intakes.
  • ^ Adjacent included.
  • ᵟ Participants provided identical responses.
  • (w) = Weighted.

Hillier FC, Batterham AM, Crooks S, Moore HJ, Summerbell CD. The development and evaluation of a novel Internet-based computer program to assess previous-day dietary and physical activity behaviours in adults: the Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program for Adults (SNAPA™). British journal of nutrition. 2012 Apr 28;107(08):1221-31.