Tool Library
Below is a list of different filter options to help you focus on particular Tool types. Filter options are categorised in Tool Characteristics and Validation Method Characteristics.
Tool Filter
- Tool Type
-
- Dietary Exposure
-
- Timeframe Tool Measures
-
- Reporting Method
-
- Format
-
Validation Method Filter
- Sex
-
- Lifestage
-
- Comparator
-
- Year of Tool Validation
-
- Area
-
Below is a list of all the identified and validated Tools. Scroll through and select a Tool to display more information.
- 24h Recall
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bingham 1994 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only (Unstructured) 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only (Structured) 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Bingham 1997 Biomarkers Adults Female Only (Unstructured) 3 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Female Only (Structured) 3 ✓ Johansson 2008 Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 14 ✓ Population who were healthy enough to live in their homes without external help Detailed Information Web Link - 24h Recall
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link - 24h Recall (Food Photography)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Lazarte 2012 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 15 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The subjects were from the rural region, Eterazama, Cochabamba, Bolivia. The 24-h recall was conducted by trained dietitians. Detailed Information Web Link - 24h Recall (French adults)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Touvier 2011 24hr Recall (interview by a dietitian) Adults Male Only 27 ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were volunteers who registered their interest in participation on a specific website. The 24hour recall comparison was carried out by interview by a trained dietitian. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall (interview by a dietitian) Adults Female Only 27 ✓ ✓ ✓ - 24h Recall (Web-SPAN) W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospecitve 1 day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Storey 2012 Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Both 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ 10 schools within 6 school boards were selected for participation from a convenience sample of junior high schools. Detailed Information Web Link - 48h Recall
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 2 Days 48 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action McNaughton (Both days) 2005 Estimated Food Diary Adults Male Only 15 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The data reported in the validation study relates to the data collected in the original longitudinal study in 1989. Detailed Information Web Link Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 15 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - 7 day Estimated Food Diary
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bingham 1994 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Bingham 1997 Biomarkers Adults Female Only 3 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Johansson 2008 Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 14 ✓ Population who were healthy enough to live in their homes without external help Detailed Information Web Link - 7 day Estimated Food Diary W
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Day 2001 Biomarkers Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were members of the EPIC-Norfolk cohort Detailed Information Web Link Mckeown 2001 Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Male Only 4 ✓ Healthy Population who had participated in the main EPIC study Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Female Only 4 ✓ Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Both 4 ✓ - 7 day Food Checklist
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Prospective 1 Day Food Checklist No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bingham 1994 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only (No photographs) 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only (With photographs) 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Bingham 1997 Biomarkers Adults Female Only (No photographs) 3 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Female Only (With photographs) 3 ✓ Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link Johansson 2008 Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 14 ✓ Population who were healthy enough to live in their homes without external help Detailed Information Web Link - 72h Recall (Mediterranean region)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 3 days 72 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Schröder 2001 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - AMPM W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 1 day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Blanton 2006 Doubly Labelled Water Adults (Premenopausal) Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ Participants met a strict inclusion criteria including: current use of hormonal contraceptive pill, premenopausal and not pregnant or lactating. Most were Caucasian graduate students. Detailed Information Web Link Estimated Food Diary Adults (Premenopausal) Female Only 36 ✓ ✓ - ASA24 W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Thompson 2014 24hr Recall (AMPM) Adults Male Only 13 ✓ Efforts were made to recruit a diverse range of participiants. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall (AMPM) Adults Female Only 13 ✓ - ASA24-Kids W
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 days 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Diep 2015 Direct observation Children, Adolescents (aged 9-11 years) Both 0 ✓ The validation study doesn't report data on nutrients, therefore this information is not represented in our Validation Results Table. The study looked at % matches, % instrusions, % omissions and portion-size correlation for matched foods. Detailed Information Web Link - Australian Eating Survey (AES) FFQ
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective; Usual 6 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Collins 2014 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 24 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES) FFQ
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient Retrospective; Usual 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Barclay 2007 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were randomly selected from Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES), weighted to include more older people (65-85 years) Detailed Information Web Link - CADET FQC PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Prospective; Retrospective 1 Day Food Checklist No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Cade 2006 Weighed Food Diary Children Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Christian 2015 Weighed Food Diary Children Both 9 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Calcium Intake Questionnaire
-
Tool Information
Action Micronutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Year (though guidance to calculating intakes per day are also provided) Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Nelson 1988 Duplicate Diet Elderly Female Only 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy elderly residents. Detailed Information Web Link Nelson 1988 Weighed Food Diary Elderly Female Only 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy elderly residents. Detailed Information Web Link - Cambridge FFQ
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bingham 1994 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - COMPASS questionnaire W
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Leatherdale 2013 Objectively measured (web-based tool) Adolescents Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ A convenience sample of 178 students in grade 9 from 4 different schools was used. Detailed Information Web Link - Day in the Life Questionnaire (DILQ)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Edmunds 2002 Direct Observation Children Both 0 ✓ ✓ Population represented different school environments and socio-economic catchment areas (2 primary schools were city-based and 2 were village-based) Detailed Information Web Link - DEGS FFQ W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 4 Weeks Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Haftenberger 2010 24hr Recall Adults, Elderly Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were a part of the German National Nutrition Monitoring (NEMONIT). Detailed Information Web Link - Diet History
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Retrospective 1 Week Diet History No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Black 2000 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were a part of the EPIC study Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Female Only 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Black 2000 Doubly Labelled Water Adults Female Only 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were a part of the EPIC study Detailed Information Web Link - Diet History
-
Tool Information
Action Energy Usual; Retrospective 1 Week Diet History No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Livingstone 1992 Doubly Labelled Water Children (3 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Population represented a range of Socio-economic areas of Belfast Detailed Information Web Link Doubly Labelled Water Children (5 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Children (7 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Children (9 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (12 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (15 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (18 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Children, Adolescents (3-18 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ - Diet History Interview PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Diet History No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Jackson 1990 Food Frequency Questionnaire Elderly Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The study was carried out in an area of inner city deprivation. All subjects with an Asian surname were excluded due to difference in diets and the possible language difficulties. Detailed Information Web Link - Diet History Interview (DISHES 98) W
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Retrospective; Usual 4 weeks Diet History No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Mensink 2001 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were recruited from 2 research centres and included a variety of socio-economic statuses. All subjects received a small incentive. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults Both 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - Diet History Questionnaire (Pregnant women)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Micronutrient Retrospective 1 month Diet History Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Shiraishi 2012 Biomarkers Adults Female Only 2 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were 2nd trimester pregnant women from 2 hospitals in Tokyo, Japan Detailed Information Web Link - Diet Questionnaire
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient Usual; Retrospective Day/Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Heller 1981 Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 1 ✓ Participants at high-risk of coronary heart disease. Detailed Information Web Link - Diet-A
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Lee 2017 24hr Recall Adolescents Both 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ The subjects were Korean high school students Detailed Information Web Link - Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education (DINE)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient Usual; Retrospective Day/Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Roe 1994 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ Employees of the Rover Group Detailed Information Web Link Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link - Dietary Recall Questionnaire PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Moore 2007 24hr Recall Children Both 0 ✓ ✓ Children from 58 schools in 9 Local Education Authorities across Wales. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Children Male Only 0 ✓ ✓ 24hr Recall Children Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ - Dietary Targets Monitor (DTM) W
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective; Usual Day/Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Lean 2003 Food Frequency Questionnaire Adults Both 0 ✓ Subjects completed both questionnaires in 1997. Detailed Information Web Link - DietQ FFQ (Fatty acids)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Broadfield 2003 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Staff and research students from the Division of Respiratory Medicine. Detailed Information Web Link - Eat and Track (EaT) W
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Retrospective; Prospective 3 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Wellard-Cole 2019 24hr Recall Adults Both 6 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The participants were 18-30 years old children in Australia. Detailed Information Web Link - e-CA
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Food Groups Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Torre 2017 24hr Recall Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Estimated Food Diary W
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Lanigan 2001 Doubly Labelled Water Infants and toddlers Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ Inclusion criteria included mothers with singleton births and the child was in good health and ate a western-type diet. Detailed Information Web Link Lanigan 2001 Weighed Food Diary Infants and toddlers Both 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ Inclusion criteria included mothers with singleton births and the child was in good health and ate a western-type diet. Detailed Information Web Link - Estimated Food Diary (Toddlers)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Prospective 1 day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Cheng 2012 Weighed Food Diary Infants and toddlers Both 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Parental social class was evenly distributed Detailed Information Web Link - European Community Respiratory Health Survey-II
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Hooper 2010 24hr Recall Adults Both 4 ✓ Subjects were a part of the ECRHS-II Study Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ
-
Tool Information
Action Micronutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bodner 1998 Biomarkers Adults Male Only 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were part of a trial looking at antioxidant intake and adult onset asthma. Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Female Only 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective Month (s) Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Margetts 1989 24hr Recall Adults Both 9 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited from participants in a larger study of diet and health in three English towns Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (12 months old) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Marriot 2009 Weighed Food Diary Infants and toddlers Both 23 ✓ ✓ ✓ The infants were the offspring of the women that were recruited in the Southampton Women Survey (SWS). The infants were born between 1998 and 2003. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (4-5 years old) W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Vioque 2016 24hr Recall Children Both 30 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy Children enrolled in the Spanish Childhood and Environment Project of Valencia (INMA study) Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Children Both 8 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ (6 months old) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Marriot 2008 Weighed Food Diary Infants and toddlers Both 23 ✓ ✓ ✓ The infants were the offspring of the women that were recruited in the Southampton Women Survey (SWS). The infants were born between 1998 and 2003. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Adolescent, adult and elderly)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 12 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Henn 2010 24hr Recall Adolescents Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were randomly selected from schools, universities and recreational areas in the Porto Alegre and Metropolitan areas in Southern Brazil. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ 24hr Recall Elderly Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Adolescents) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective; Usual 6 months (Before the interview) Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Araujo 2010 Estimated Food Diary Adolescents Both 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects included a variety of socioeconomic status' Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Allergens during pregnancy) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 9 Months (During pregnancy) Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Venter 2006 Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 0 ✓ Pregnant Women Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Bangladesh)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective;Usual 3 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Mumu 2020 24hr Recall Adults Both 20 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Bone mineral density)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Rivas 2009 24hr Recall Adults Female Only 23 ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy adult women Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Botswana) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Jackson 2012 24hr Recall Adults; Elderly Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were selected from those enrolled in the epidemiological survey of diet and weight status. The final sample consisted of 16 males and 63 females with mixed characteristics of urban and rural settings. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Castilla-La Mancha region)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective Day/Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Fregapane 2000 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 32 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (China)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient Usual; Retrospective 3 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Zang 2019 24hr Recall Adults and Elderly Both 24 ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (China)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Zhuang 2012 24hr Recall Adults, Elderly Both 15 ✓ ✓ ✓ There was a higher proportion of women (62%) and those without high / senior school education (87%) in the cohort Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Colombia)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient Retrospective; Usual Day/Week/Month/Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Dehghan 2012 24hr Recall Adults Both 8 ✓ ✓ A convenience sample was used for both the development and validation of the tool, this contained some illiterate individuals Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults Male Only 8 ✓ ✓ 24hr Recall Adults Female Only 8 ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Dietary total antioxidant capacity) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 3 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Pellegrini 2007 Weighed Food Diary Adults (aged 35-88 years) Male Only 0 ✓ Subjects were previous and current workers from the Barilla food company in Parma, Italy. Participant screening and exclusion criteria relating to particular medical conditions was applied.The study did not assess nutrient intake. Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adults (aged 35-88 years) Female Only 0 ✓ - FFQ (Energy intake, 4-6 year olds)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy Usual; Retrospective 4 weeks Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Dutman 2010 Doubly labelled water Children (4-6 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited through advertising at schools and day care centres Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Fatty Acids & Antioxidants)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Stiegler 2009 24hr Recall Children Both 16 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The subjects were a part of the GINI PLUS Study Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (FODMAPs)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective Day/Week/Month/Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Barrett 2011 Estimated Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 36 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ There were a greater proportion of women and higher education levels and weekly income in the studied group Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Food stores)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective; Usual Day/Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Horwath 1990 Direct Observation Elderly Both 0 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Fruits & Vegetables-Pregnant Women)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 6 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Mikkelsen 2007 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were part of the DNBC (Danish National Birth Cohort) living in Odense, Denmark in weeks 30-31 of their pregnancy. Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers (urine) Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers (plasma) Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers (erythrocytes) Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ (I) (Food groups)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Restrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Ocke 1997 24hr Recall Adults Male Only 0 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited from towns in the Netherlands from ongoing projects. The questionnaire assessed food group intake where vegetable intake comparison was assessed. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ - FFQ (II) (Nutrients)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Ocke 1997 24hr Recall Adults Male Only 8 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited from towns in the Netherlands from ongoing projects Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults Female Only 8 ✓ ✓ - FFQ (India)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Vijay 2020 7-day food diaries Adults and Elderly Both 26 ✓ ✓ The study population comprised of individuals from rural and urban sectors of Trivandrum, South Kerala. Only one person per household was allowed to enroll in the study. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Inulin & Oligofructose)
-
Tool Information
Action Retrospective 1 Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Dunn 2011 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy students and staff at King's College London Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Inuvialuit) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective; Usual 1 month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Pakseresht 2010 24hr Recall Adults Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The tool was developed based on dietary intake data from 2 communities, the validation study only used participants from 1 of the communities. Participants were the main food shopper or preparer in their household. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults (≤50 years) Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 24hr Recall Adults (>50 years) Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Italian adults) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Turconi 2010 24hr Recall (interview by dietitian) Adults (20-60 years) Both 8 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were students, staff and general public members aged 20-60, recruited from a university café in Italy of normal BMI and no health issues. Results are not split into gender Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Italy)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective 3 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Zanini 2020 mean of 3-day food diaries and one 24-hour recall Adults Both 21 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The study protocol of the SEELN project involved the selection of two cohorts of subjects: subjects with liver steatosis and healthy subjects (i.e., without liver steatosis). Excluded subjects with evidence of other causes of liver disease (as viral or autoimmune hepatitis, alcohol consumption, drug-induced liver steatosis), serious clinical illness, pregnancy, or breast-feeding, and ongoing treatment potentially affecting development and/or progression of NAFLD. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Japan)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 2 Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Kato 2017 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 53 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Japanese population Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 53 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Japan)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Watanabe 2019 7-day Dietary Record Elderly Female Only 22 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link 7-day Dietary Record Adults and Elderly Male Only 22 ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Latin American Adults)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 12 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Elorriaga 2013 24hr Recall Adults, Elderly Both 20 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were recruited via opportunistic sampling from primary-care centres in three Latin American countries (Chile, Uruguay and Argentina) Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Malaysian Adolescents)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Nurul-Fadhilih 2012 24hr Recall Adolescents Both 23 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were adolescents with an equal gender split randomly sampled from 2 secondary schools in Malaysia Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Mediterranean Diet-Elderly) W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Fernandez-Ballart 2010 Estimated Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 20 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants from the PREDIMED Study Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Mediterranean region)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective Day/Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Schröder 2001 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (MetaCardis France) W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective; Usual 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Verger 2016 24hr Recall Adults, Elderly Both 27 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ All following results relate to the French FFQ only. Participants were recruited from hospitals. The design of the relative validity study is not optimal. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Netherlands)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 4 Weeks Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Visser 2020 24hr Recall Adults and Elderly Both 28 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (North China)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual;Retrospective Day/week/month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Wang 2008 24hr Recall Adults, Elderly Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Random selection of individuals from Xi'an city Shaanxi province Municipal Resident Registry Office (age range 50-79 yrs). Participants required to be free of diseases influencing food consumption. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults, Elderly Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Peanut)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Food Groups Retrospective; Usual 1 Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Sofianou-Katsouilis 2011 Estimated Food Diary Children, Adults Both 1 N/A Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Pregnant Women)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Prospective 7 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Barbieri 2015 24hr Recall Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ Subjects were pregnant women attending public health clinics in Ribeirao, Brazil from a range of educational and socio-economic backgrounds Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Pregnant Women)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Micronutrient Retrospective; Usual 1 month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Mejía-Rodríguez 2012 24hr Recall Adolescents, Adults (First trimester of pregnancy, 15-37 years) Female Only 4 ✓ ✓ All participants had participated in a prospective study to evaluate dietary intake during pregnancy, 4-6 years earlier. Results shown are for the FFQ-month only and do not include supplements. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adolescents, Adults (Third trimester of pregnancy, 15-37 years) Female Only 4 ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Pregnant Women) W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Vioque 2013 Biomarkers Adults Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ Pregnant women Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Prospective cohort study on diet and cancer) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Goldbohm 1993 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 18 ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were a subgroup of a large-scale prospective cohort study on dietary habits and cancer in the Netherlands. Cohort included both males and females. Study results not categorised into gender. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Protein and potassium)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient Retrospective 1 month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Geelan 2014 24hr Recall Adults (45-65 years) Male Only 2 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited by convenience sampling from Wageningen, The Netherlands Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults (45-65 years) Female Only 2 ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Qatar)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Prospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bawadi 2021 24hr Recall Adults Both 30 ✓ ✓ A convenient sample of healthy Qataris were recruited from family members of Qatar University students. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (short NDNS)
-
Tool Information
Action Micronutrient Usual; Retrospective 4 Days Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Shaw 2021 Biomarkers Adolescents Both 7 ✓ The tool was developed from 4d food diaries from NDNS and compared against NDNS biomarkers Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (short NZ)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient Prospective;Usual 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Sam 2020 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy (i.e., did not have a chronic disease), non-pregnant, and not on a diet Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (South Asian Women in Britain)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective 1 Year (Past year) Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Kassam-Khamis 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 6 ✓ ✓ ✓ South Asian Population Detailed Information Web Link Sevak 2004 24hr Recall Adults Female Only 16 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ South Asian Population Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (South India)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective 4 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Iqbal 2008 24hr Recall Adults Both 10 ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were part of the PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological Study) Cohort Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Suihua, North China)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 9 months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Xia 2011 24hr recall Adolescents Female Only 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were adolescent females (12-18yrs) from a multi-level cluster sample from 3 middle schools in the Suihua district of Heilongjiang Province of China Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ (Whitehall II Study)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Brunner 2001 Estimated Food Diary Adults Male Only 18 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were drawn from the Whitehall II longitudinal study of British civil servants (Marmot et al., 1991) Detailed Information Web Link Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 18 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - FFQ (Women) W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Day/Week/Month/Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Martin-Moreno 1993 Estimated Food Diary Adults, Elderly Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were drawn from the controls of a population-based case-control study on breast and colorectal cancer (Martin-Moreno et al. 1991). The results displayed are taken from Questionnaire 2. Detailed Information Web Link - FFQ Malaysia)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient Prospective 3 Days Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Shahar 2021 3-day diet recall Adults and Elderly Both 10 ✓ ✓ The inclusion criteria included being a Malaysian citizen, possession of a valid nationality identification card, not suffering from any acute illness at the time of study, and those who gave written informed consent to the study. Those with debilitating illnesses, including cancers, and those who refused consent were excluded. Detailed Information Web Link - Five a day Community Evaluation Tool (FACET)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Ashfield-Watt 2007 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Food Amount Frequency Questionnaire
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Usual; Retrospective Day/Week/Month/Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Hartwell 2001 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy Population. Data for male only and female only is available in the publication. Detailed Information Web Link - Food Checklist PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Prospective 1 Day Food Checklist No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Holmes 2008 Weighed Food Diary Children Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Income Population Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Children Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Elderly Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ - Food Consumption Frequency Questionnaire PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Trinidad Rodriguez 2008 24hr Recall Adults, Adolescents Both 18 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Food Diary (Web-based)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy Prospective 1 day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Hutchesson 2013 Doubly Labelled Water Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were overweight or obese female staff or students from The University of Newcastle, Australia Detailed Information Web Link - Food Intake Questionnaire (FIQ)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day Food Checklist No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Johnson 2001 Estimated Food Diary Adolescents Both 0 ✓ Participants were involved in a school-based nutrition education programme in a secondary school. Detailed Information Web Link - Food Recall Checklist (FoRC)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Comrie 2009 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Undergraduate students at the University of Aberdeen. Detailed Information Web Link - Food4Me W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Fallaize 2014 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 20 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Forster 2014 Food Frequency Questionnaire Adults Both 22 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Subjects were Reading, UK and Dublin, Ireland Detailed Information Web Link - Foodbook24 W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective; Prospective 2 Days Food Frequency Questionnaire and 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Timon 2017 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 27 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The participants were Irish adults Detailed Information Web Link - German EPIC FFQ1 PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bohlscheid-Thomas 1997 24hr Recall Adults Both 12 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Boeing 1997 24hr Recall Adults Both 4 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Both 4 ✓ Kroke 1999 24hr Recall Adults Both 12 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adults Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - German EPIC FFQ2
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Nothlings 2007 24hr Recall Adults Both 18 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were a part of the EPIC-Potsdam study Detailed Information Web Link - HEA 1 (Health Education Authority in Oxford)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Day Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link - HEA 2 (Health Education Authority in Oxford)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Day/Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link - HEA 3 (Health Education Authority in Oxford)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Day/Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link - INTAKE24 W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bradley 2016 24hr Recall Adolescents Both 10 ✓ ✓ The population represented a range of socio-economic status and ethnicity. Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults Both 10 ✓ ✓ Foster 2019 Doubly labelled water Adults Both 8 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Keenoa PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Prospective 3 Days Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Ji 2020 3-day food diary Adults and Elderly Both 18 ✓ ✓ Adults (>18 years of age) who owned a smartphone (Android or Apple) and would be able to download the Keenoa app without assistance. Detailed Information Web Link - KiGGS FFQ "What do you eat" W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 4 Weeks Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Truthmann 2011 Diet Histories Adolescents Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were a part of the EsKiMo Study Detailed Information Web Link - Meal-based intake assessment tool (MBIAT)
-
Tool Information
Action Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Heath 2005 Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 5 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were excluded if they had chronic or acute illness that might affect Fe intake or status. Detailed Information Web Link - Meal-Q FFQ (Energy & macronutrient)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Retrospective: Usual Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Christensen 2013 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 6 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited through the VALMA study and from three universities in Stockholm, Sweden. Detailed Information Web Link - Meal-Q FFQ (Micronutrient & fibre)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient Retrospective; Usual Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Christensen 2014 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 19 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited through the VALMA study and from three universities in Stockholm, Sweden. Detailed Information Web Link - Medical Research Council-Caerphilly Questionnaire
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bolton-Smith 1991 Biomarkers Adults Male Only 5 ✓ Data split by smokers and non-smokers Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Male Only (Smokers) 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers Adults Male Only (Non-smokers) 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Thompson 1993 Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 16 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Cigarette smokers from general practices in Southampton Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 16 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - Mfood Log
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Lemacks 2019 24hr Recall Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - MijnEetmeter W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Prospective 3 Days Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Ocké 2021 24hr Recall Adults and Elderly Both 6 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were able to use MijnEetmeter on their smartphone, tablet, or computer. Exclusion criteria were not speaking the Dutch language, being pregnant, breastfeeding, being a professional or student in dietetics or nutrition, and participating in other research at the same time. Detailed Information Web Link - MiniMeal-Q (Energy & macronutrient)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Retrospective; Usual Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Christensen 2013 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 6 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited through the VALMA study and from three universities in Stockholm, Sweden. Detailed Information Web Link - MiniMeal-Q (Micronutrient & fibre)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient Retrospective; Usual Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Christensen 2014 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 19 ✓ ✓ Subjects were recruited through the VALMA study and from three universities in Stockholm, Sweden. Detailed Information Web Link - Multiple Pass 24h Recall
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Holmes 2008 Weighed Food Diary Children Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Income Population Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Children Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Elderly Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ - Multiple Pass 24h Recall
-
Tool Information
Action Energy Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Reilly 2001 Doubly Labelled Water Children Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ Population represented a range of socio-economic status Detailed Information Web Link Montgomery 2005 Doubly Labelled Water Children Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ Population represented a range of socio-economic status Detailed Information Web Link Johnson 1996 Doubly Labelled Water Children Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ Children who volunteered for ongoing studies on energy requirements in young children. Detailed Information Web Link Doubly Labelled Water Children Male Only 1 ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Children Female Only 1 ✓ - My Meal Mate (MMM) W
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Carter 2013 24hr Recall Adults Both 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Almost half of participants were trying to lose weight. Detailed Information Web Link - MyFitnessPal W
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Retrospective; Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Teixeira 2018 Paper Food Record Adults Both 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ The participants were university students Detailed Information Web Link - myfood24 W PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Retrospective; Prospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Albar 2016 24hr Recall Adolescents Both 8 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Detailed Information Web Link Wark 2018 24hr Recall Adults Both 7 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Online tool compared to biomarkers and 3 x 24h recalls Detailed Information Web Link Koch 2020 24hr Recall Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ This validated the myfood24 (Germany) tool in German adults. The German version of myfood24 is adapted to German foods and consumption habits.Participants had to be ≥18 years old and fluent in German. Nutrition professionals and students of Nutritional Sciences were excluded. Detailed Information Web Link - Novel Assessment of Nutrition and Ageing method (NANA)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Prospective 1 day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Timon 2015 Estimated Food Diary Elderly Both 16 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Elderly population, living in the community without diagnosis of dementia. Detailed Information Web Link - Nurses Questions
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Day Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link - Oxford FFQ
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bingham 1994 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Bingham 1997 Biomarkers Adults Female Only 3 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Johansson 2008 Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 14 ✓ Population who were healthy enough to live in their homes without external help Detailed Information Web Link Samaras 1998 Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 5 ✓ Participants were twins. Detailed Information Web Link Little 1999 Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 2 ✓ Patients in a primary care setting Detailed Information Web Link - Oxford WebQ
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective;Usual 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Liu 2011 24hr Recall Adults Both 20 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Greenwood 2019 24hr Recall Adults Both 3 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Photo-based dietary record
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Prinz 2018 Weighed Food Diary Adults and Elderly Both 4 ✓ ✓ Healthy, non-pregnant volunteers (≥18 years) without intent to lose weight recruited at Ulm University, Germany. Detailed Information Web Link - Pre-coded Food Record Form PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Prospective 1 Day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Rodriguez 2014 24hr Recall Adults Both 0 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Quantitative FFQ (QFFQ)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective; Usual 1 Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action MacIntyre 2000 Weighed Food Diary Adolescents, Adults Both 8 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Volunteers were recruited from participants in the THUSA study Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adolescents, Adults Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ - Quest1
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 3 Months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action O'Donnell 1991 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 20 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy Caucasian who are not suffering from any chronic disorder nor following any special or therapeutic diet Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 20 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 20 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers Adults Both 3 ✓ Biomarkers Adults Male Only 3 ✓ Biomarkers Adults Female Only 3 ✓ - R24W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Lafreniere 2018 Food Diary Estimated Adults Both 23 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ French Canadian adults in Canada Detailed Information Web Link - Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM)
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Prospective 6 days Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Martin 2012 Doubly Labelled Water Adults Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ 88% of subjects were female, 62% were White and 38% were African American. Only results reported from study 2 (validation of nutrients) are summarised here. Detailed Information Web Link Laboratory-based buffet meals (quantified by weighing food provision and waste) Adults Both 10 ✓ ✓ - School-Based Nutrition Monitoring (SBNM) questionnaire
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective; Usual Day/Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Hoelscher 2003 24hr Recall Adolescents (8th graders) Both 0 ✓ ✓ Eighth grade students in middle schools from central Texas were used. 38%, 41% and 17% were white, Hispanic and African American Detailed Information Web Link - Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Retrospective; Usual 2-3 Months Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Masson 2003 Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 25 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants included men who had recently participated in a population-based study of coronary heart disease risk factors, women attending a Family Planning Clinic, and men and women recruited from a variety of public sector workplaces. Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 25 ✓ ✓ ✓ Jia 2008 Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 25 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Free-living healthy older people. Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Elderly Female Only 25 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Elderly Both 24 ✓ ✓ Heald 2006 Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Male Only 5 ✓ ✓ Control participants in the PCANDIET study Detailed Information Web Link Hollis 2017 Estimated Food Diary Adults Both 26 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were recruited from the 2010 Scottish Health Survey (SHeS) sample Detailed Information Web Link Mohd-Shukri 2013 Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 36 ✓ ✓ Pregnant Women (between 12 and 29 weeks' gestation) from an ongoing cohort study of severe obesity in pregnancy at the Antenatal Metabolic Clinic, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK. Data split by BMI status (obese vs lean women) Detailed Information Web Link - Semiquantitative Food Diary (Germany) W
-
Tool Information
Action Energy Prospective 1 day Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Koebnick 2005 Doubly Labelled Water Adults Male Only 0 ✓ ✓ Subjects were healthy with a BMI < 30kg/m2, all subjects had no prior experience of dietary assessments tools. Detailed Information Web Link Doubly Labelled Water Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adults Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ - Semi-weighed Food Diary
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Prospective 1 Day Weighed Food Diary No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Holmes 2008 Weighed Food Diary Children Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Income Population Detailed Information Web Link Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Elderly Male Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Children Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Elderly Female Only 11 ✓ ✓ ✓ - Sheffield FFQ (Pregnant Women) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Retrospective; Usual 4 weeks Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Mouratidou 2006 24hr Recall Adults Female Only 36 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pregnant Women Detailed Information Web Link - Short FFQ (Folate) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Micronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Pufulete 2002 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were recruited from the staff and students from King's College London and through publicity in sports centres, libraries and other public venues. Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults Both 1 ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers Adults Male Only 1 ✓ Biomarkers Adults Female Only 1 ✓ - Short FFQ (Legume) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Papadaki 2007 Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ Healthy Population Detailed Information Web Link - Short Food Group Questionnaire W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Week Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Roddam 2005 Weighed/Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 22 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were part of the Million Women Study Detailed Information Web Link - Short Food List (Total fat & Fatty acid)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient Retrospective 1 year Food Checklist No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Rohrmann 2003 Food Frequency Questionnaire Adults Both 5 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Short Form FFQ PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Week/Month Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Cleghorn 2016 Food Frequency Questionnaire Adults Both 2 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link 24hr Recall Adults Both 2 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - Short Qualitative Food Frequency List (FFL)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Usual; Retrospective Day/Week/Month Food Checklist No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Winkler 1998 Weighed Food Diary Adults Male Only 0 ✓ ✓ Participants were part of the MONICA project Augsburg Detailed Information Web Link - Shorter Food Frequency e-Questionnaire (FFeQ) PDF
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Affret 2018 24hr Recall Adults Both 31 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ French Adults Detailed Information Web Link - Supermarket Sales Data (New Zealand)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient Prospective 3 months Supermarket Sales Data No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Eyles 2010 24hr Recall Adults Both 6 ✓ ✓ ✓ Participants were predominantly female with a high level of education and income compared to the general New Zealand population Detailed Information Web Link - Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program (SNAP)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Moore 2008 24hr Recall Children, Adolescents Both 0 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program Adults (SNAPA)
-
Tool Information
Action Food Groups Retrospective 1 Day 24 Hour Recall No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Hillier 2012 Direct Observation Adults Both 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - The Maastricht FFQ
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Prospective;Usual 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Dongen 2019 24hr Recall Adults and Elderly Both 21 ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - UK EPIC FFQ W
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Day 2001 Estimated/Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Both 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Mckeown 2001 Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Male Only 4 ✓ Healthy Population Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Female Only 4 ✓ Biomarkers Adults, Elderly Both 4 ✓ Estimated/Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Male Only 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Estimated/Weighed Food Diary Adults, Elderly Female Only 14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Lietz 2002 Weighed Food Diary Adolescents Both 9 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Adolescents Both 2 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Verkasalo 2001 Estimated Food Diary Adults Female Only 0 ✓ Subjects were a part of the EPIC-Oxford cohort Detailed Information Web Link - Vienna Food Record
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Prospective 4 Days Food Diary Estimated No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Putz 2019 Weighed Food Diary Adults Both 32 ✓ ✓ Austrians without (self-) diagnosed food allergies or intolerances, not at any medication, and not nutrition experts. Detailed Information Web Link - WDDRs
-
Tool Information
Action Full Nutrient Prospective 1 Day Weighed Food Diary No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Matsuzaki 2017 Weighed Food Diary Adults Female Only 13 ✓ ✓ The participants were Japanese women Detailed Information Web Link - WebFFQ (Norway Adults)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy, Macronutrient, Food Groups Usual; Retrospective 1 Year Food Frequency Questionnaire No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Medin 2017 24hr Recall Adults Both 4 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Norwegian adult population Detailed Information Web Link - Weighed Food Diary
-
Tool Information
Action Micronutrient Retrospective 1 Day Weighed Food Diary No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bingham 1997 Biomarkers Adults Female Only 4 ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link - Weighed Food Diary
-
Tool Information
Action Energy Prospective 1 Day Weighed Food Diary No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Livingstone 1992 Doubly Labelled Water Children (7 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Population represented a range of Socio-economic areas of Belfast Detailed Information Web Link Doubly Labelled Water Children (9 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (12 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (15 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Adolescents (18 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ Doubly Labelled Water Children, Adolescents (7-18 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ - Weighed Food Diary (DONALD)
-
Tool Information
Action Macronutrient Prospective 1 day Weighed Food Diary No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Bokhof 2010 Biomarkers Children (3-4 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N in urine was measured by the Kjeldahl method and the assumption was made that the N excreted accounted for 80% of the ingested protein. Detailed Information Web Link Biomarkers Children (7-8 years) Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers Adolescents Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers Adolescents, Adults Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Biomarkers Children, Adolescents, Adults Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ - Weighed Food Diary (Pre-school Children)
-
Tool Information
Action Energy Prospective 1 Day Weighed Food Diary No Detailed Information Web Link Validation Papers
Author Year Comparator Lifestage Sex Number of Nutrients Validated Mean Difference Variance Measured Correlation Coefficients Percentage Agreement Limits of Agreement Special Considerations Action Davies 1994 Doubly Labelled Water Children, Infants and toddlers Both 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A Detailed Information Web Link
153 Tools displayed out of a possible 153 Tools. Please try the search again with more flexible filter options.